|
Listed
below are questions frequently asked about the Committee for the
Protection of Human Subjects and the application process and the
responses. Any additional questions can be sent to dcomeaux@uh.edu
(If this E-mail link does not work, please contact your system
administrator to configure your web browser for E-mail). Responses
will be sent back to the inquirer and, if general in nature, posted
to this page.
|
QUESTION:
What is the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects?
|
| ANSWER:
The Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects
(CPHS) serves as the University’s institutional review board
(IRB). An IRB is a specially constituted review body established
or designated by an entity to protect the welfare of human subjects
recruited to participate in biomedical or behavioral research.
|
|
QUESTION:
How
do I know if I need to submit an application to CPHS?
|
ANSWER:
All
research projects involving the use of human subjects (including
projects utilizing archival or existing data) must be submitted
to the CPHS for approval. Human subjects are individuals who
physiologic or behavioral characteristics and responses are
the object of study in a research project. Under the federal
regulations (45 CFR 46.102[f]), human subjects are defined as
living individual(s) about whom an investigator conducting research
obtains:
(1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual;
or (2) identifiable private information. |
|
QUESTION:
Is
there more than one committee?
|
|
ANSWER:
At
this time, the University of Houston has 2 approved IRBs.
The institutional committee is responsible for the review
of all applications from investigators of all colleges/departments
with the exception of Social Sciences. This committee consists
of 10 members; five faculty, 2 medical reps, 1 graduate student
rep, 1 community rep, and 1 non-science member.
The College
of Social Sciences CPHS reviews all applications from the
departments within Social Sciences. [Exception: the institutional
committee must review files that include a medical component
since the SOS CPHS does not include medical reps] This committee
has 5 members; 3 faculty members, 1 community rep, and 1 non-science
member.
Also
each committee has a subcommittee consisting of the chair
and 1 other committee member. The subcommittees can only review
files that qualify for exempt and/or expedited review.
|
|
QUESTION:
How
often do the committees meet?
|
| ANSWER:Each
committee meets at least once a month including the summer months.
The deadline for submission is 2 weeks prior to the committee
meeting date. |
|
QUESTION:
What
is exempt review and how do I know if I qualify?
|
|
ANSWER:
Based
on DHHS regulations, the University has adopted 6 categories
of research as exempt from continuing CPHS review. The use
of the term exempt refers only to the requirement for
annual review, not the general requirements for informed consent
and protection of subjects.
Only
truly anonymous research is eligible for exempt status provided
any additional requirements specified in each category are
also satisfied. Either a full committee or a subcommittee
can review files that qualify for one of the exempt categories.
|
|
QUESTION:
What
is expedited review and how do I know if I qualify?
|
| ANSWER:
DHHS
regulations recognize that there are certain categories of research
which involve procedures which pose no more than minimal risks
to subjects and for which clear standards can be set. Standard
requirements for informed consent and protection of human subjects
apply regardless of the type of review. Either a full committee
or a subcommittee can review files that qualify for one of the
9 categories. |
|
QUESTION:
When
I submit my application, how many copies are required?
|
|
ANSWER:
The
number of copies required is determined by which committee
you will be submitting to. Listed below is a breakdown by
committee:
1) Institutional
committee (all colleges except Social Sciences); original
plus 9 copies of the application and all related documents.
2) Social
Sciences Committee; original plus 5 copies of the application
and all related documents.
3) Both
subcommittees; original plus 1 copy of the application and
all related documents.
|
|
QUESTION:
What
do I need to attach to my application?
|
|
ANSWER:
Adequate
documentation must be attached to the application to allow
the CPHS to weight the following factors: (1) that the rights
and welfare of the subjects will be adequately protected;
(2) that the risks to the subjects are reasonable in relation
to anticipated benefits; and(3) that the informed consent
of subjects will be obtained by adequate and appropriate methods.
Documentation
must include: all relevant informed consent document; copies
of any and all questionnaires or research instruments (if
appropriate); a list of questions for interviews (if appropriate);
copies of recruitment ads; copies of approval from cooperating
facilities or institutions (such as a school district); any
other documentation that you feel might facilitate the committee’s
review.
|
|
QUESTION:
How
soon after the committee meeting will I be notified
of their decisions?
|
| ANSWER:
Written
correspondence is sent via inter-campus mail 7 to 10 working
days after the committee meets. Letters to graduate students
are mailed care of the faculty sponsor. Committee decisions
are not given over the telephone.
|
|
QUESTION:
How
do I know if I need to prepare an informed consent?
|
|
ANSWER:
No
subject may be involved in research without the legally effective
informed consent of the subject or the subject’s legally authorized
representative. This consent shall be sought under circumstances
that provide sufficient opportunities for the subject to freely
consider whether or not to participate. If the subject is
a minor (less than 18 years of age), written parental consent
is required. In addition to the parental consent, the investigator
must also obtain the assent of the child unless the child
is too young or incapable of giving assent
|
|
QUESTION:
If
I have the parents’ permission, why do I need the child’s
assent?
|
| ANSWER:
Out
of respect for children as developing persons, children should
be asked whether or not they wish to participate in a research
project. In order to minimize undue influence, parental consent
and child assent should be obtained through separate procedures.
|
|
QUESTION:
What
is a negative consent?
|
|
ANSWER:
A negative consent requires a subject to decline participation
and is not an acceptable procedure.
|
|
QUESTION:
What
type of information should be included in an informed
consent?
|
|
ANSWER:
It
is important to remember that informed consent is a process
and the written informed consent serves to document this process.
The informed consent document must include sufficient information
to allow the potential subject to understand what he/she is
being asked to do and to weigh any risks against the potential
benefit before agreeing whether or not to participate. The
consent must be formulated in language that is appropriate
for the targeted population. Federal regulations require the
inclusion of certain information such as the number of potential
subjects, how much time will be required, risks, benefits,
etc. University policy dictates the inclusion of information
such as the name and telephone number for a faculty advisor
if the investigator is a student, a review statement indicating
that the project has been reviewed by the CPHS and provides
a telephone number for the CPHS, etc.
Please
refer to the Policies and Procedures Handbook for additional
information and sample consent forms.
|
| QUESTION:
What are the possible decisions the CPHS can issue? |
|
ANSWER:
There
are several decisions that might be issued by the CPHS. They
are:
1) Approval;
no changes required. Project must be renewed annually.
2) Exempt
; no changes required. Project must be renewed every 5 years.
3) Contingent
Approval/Contingent Exempt; minor changes and/or additions
required. Changes do not require additional committee
review. Review of changes and final approval is issued by
the CPHS Coordinator.
4) Table
; significant problems and/or missing documentation. Changes
must go back to the committee for review and approval.
5) Disapprove;
project does not comply with human subjects’ regulations and
the committee is convinced that the problems
can not be corrected.
|
|
|